PDA

View Full Version : The Katrina Catastrophe


Zen Curmudgeon
09-01-2005, 07:56 PM
As the absolute horror of American refugees continues to unfold on the nightly news, I can't help feeling heart-breaking sympathy for the tens of thousands of victims who are still, 5 days later, trapped in a dying city.

I did a little research, to try to understand how the defenses of one of the North American continent's oldest cities has fallen to this dire condition. It ain't pretty.

January 2001: Bush appoints Joe Allbaugh, a crony from Texas, as head of FEMA. Allbaugh has no previous experience in disaster management.

April 2001: Budget Director Mitch Daniels announces the Bush administration's goal of privatizing much of FEMA's work. In May, Allbaugh confirms that FEMA will be downsized: "Many are concerned that federal disaster assistance may have evolved into both an oversized entitlement program...." he said. "Expectations of when the federal government should be involved and the degree of involvement may have ballooned beyond what is an appropriate level."

2001: FEMA designates a major hurricane hitting New Orleans as one of the three "likeliest, most catastrophic disasters facing this country."

December 2002: After less than two years at FEMA, Allbaugh announces he is leaving to start up a consulting firm that advises companies seeking to do business in Iraq. He is succeeded by his deputy, Michael Brown, who, like Allbaugh, has no previous experience in disaster management.

March 2003: FEMA is downgraded from a cabinet level position and folded into the Department of Homeland Security. Its mission is refocused on fighting acts of terrorism.

2003: Under its new organization chart within DHS, FEMA's preparation and planning functions are reassigned to a new Office of Preparedness and Response. FEMA will henceforth focus only on response and recovery.

Summer 2004: FEMA denies Louisiana's pre-disaster mitigation funding requests. Says Jefferson Parish flood zone manager Tom Rodrigue: "You would think we would get maximum consideration....This is what the grant program called for. We were more than qualified for it."

June 2004: The Army Corps of Engineers budget for levee construction in New Orleans is slashed. Jefferson Parish emergency management chiefs Walter Maestri comments: "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay."

June 2005: Funding for the New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is cut by a record $71.2 million. One of the hardest-hit areas is the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, which was created after the May 1995 flood to improve drainage in Jefferson, Orleans and St. Tammany parishes.

It keeps coming back to actions and consequences. The CEO President made a series of bad decisions, including his bootless war of conquest in Iraq, and now the consequences are being borne by those least able to bounce back from the destruction of their city. 5 days after the storm passed, we're still watching New Orleanean families drag the bodies of their dead through the streets. And I can't help but wonder how many of the Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama National Guard currently in Iraq are watching the destruction of their homes from bases in Iraq, when in years past they would have been home to help, to rescue, to preserve.

And I truly hope that those in power whose decisions set the stage for this biblical disaster at least pay the price of regret for their choices.

Donate to the Red Cross. They can sure use the cash.

Take Care, and hug someone you love tonight -

ZC

Chuckie
09-01-2005, 11:36 PM
Try researching a little deeper than that. They've known they were in trouble down there from the day they first started building those retaining walls to hold back the lake and the ocean. When was that? Well before you and I were born. They've known there was a problem when they noticed that the city was slowly sinking in the delta mud. Maybe they shouldn't have built all those sky scrapers. They knew they were below sea level and in the path of a hurricane someday. They have just spent the better part of the last century in denial that it could happen to them.

Blaming Bush for the whole problem is a copout. Clinton didn't do anything either. Nor did Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, LBJ, or Kennedy. I don't see you trying to cast blame on any of them. You bias against Bush is embarrassingly transparant.

Maybe you should try blaming the mayer of N'awlins for not having a working evacuation plan in place. Or how about the Governer? It's his state. He should have had a plan in place as well. Everyone knew it wasn't an 'if' but a 'when' it happens.

OH OH OH!!!! I got it. Let's blame their ancestors for being stupid enough to build a city in a place with no foundation. They knew because they couldn't even bury their dead underground because of the high water table. Reverse raparations in action.

large
09-02-2005, 06:42 AM
For over 40 years, knowlegeable engineers, and many others have warned of the perilous situation New Orleans was in, and with the continous growth, the situation got worse every year . .

The odd thing about the current situation is that the flooding currently seen is "Minor" to what can happen! For over 40 years, the Corps of Engineers have worked at containing the Atchafalaya River and keeping it from joining the Mississippi just northwest of N.O. Over the years they have built a system of levees and dams to keep the Atchafalaya River in it's own channel . . But, most engineers contend that in a flood situation, only ONE of the elements that they have constructed would need to fail to put 85% of New Orleans in the Gulf of Mexico with the loss of life in the thousands . .

Based on that, they got off easy Monday . . most of the inhabitants, actually, if they were smart enough, could've walked out of New Orleans on one of the thruways . . instead they chose to wade around in flood waters, and rob and loot . . or sit . . some chose to sit in their attics, which were, in a lot of cases, "Below Sea Level" . . . rocket science, here . .

New Orleans is basically a Ghetto in a Ditch . . . No federal money should be spent resurrecting a place that should be the West end of a Lake . . . In the best of conditions, the physical location is basically untenable . . while we criticise those in California for living on a "Fault Line" . . We feel sorry for those who choose to live not on an island, but "Below Sea Level" and defy physics everyday to do so! I think we're wasting compassion here . . get all those people anyplace else, and forget it . . .

If we're going to "Build a Better New Orleans", and we're gonna do it with our tax and insurance Moneys . . let's do it someplace they don't have to worry about inundation from any one of three sources, Lake Ponchartrain, the Mississippi, or the Atchafalaya River, or as the case is now, all three of them!

Zombiewire
09-02-2005, 06:48 PM
Large! I have this poll of www.pueblocoloradocasino.com with your name on it. I know that you would be a great city manager for the great town of Pueblo Colorado. You have understanding for what needs to be done. I sure hope Pueblo Colorado has someone like that in City Government with a mind as your. If I live there I would run of office but that is just me. James










For over 40 years, knowlegeable engineers, and many others have warned of the perilous situation New Orleans was in, and with the continous growth, the situation got worse every year . .

The odd thing about the current situation is that the flooding currently seen is "Minor" to what can happen! For over 40 years, the Corps of Engineers have worked at containing the Atchafalaya River and keeping it from joining the Mississippi just northwest of N.O. Over the years they have built a system of levees and dams to keep the Atchafalaya River in it's own channel . . But, most engineers contend that in a flood situation, only ONE of the elements that they have constructed would need to fail to put 85% of New Orleans in the Gulf of Mexico with the loss of life in the thousands . .

Based on that, they got off easy Monday . . most of the inhabitants, actually, if they were smart enough, could've walked out of New Orleans on one of the thruways . . instead they chose to wade around in flood waters, and rob and loot . . or sit . . some chose to sit in their attics, which were, in a lot of cases, "Below Sea Level" . . . rocket science, here . .

New Orleans is basically a Ghetto in a Ditch . . . No federal money should be spent resurrecting a place that should be the West end of a Lake . . . In the best of conditions, the physical location is basically untenable . . while we criticise those in California for living on a "Fault Line" . . We feel sorry for those who choose to live not on an island, but "Below Sea Level" and defy physics everyday to do so! I think we're wasting compassion here . . get all those people anyplace else, and forget it . . .

If we're going to "Build a Better New Orleans", and we're gonna do it with our tax and insurance Moneys . . let's do it someplace they don't have to worry about inundation from any one of three sources, Lake Ponchartrain, the Mississippi, or the Atchafalaya River, or as the case is now, all three of them!

large
09-03-2005, 11:30 AM
I love it! The Democrats, the Black Caucus, the Mayor and the Chief of Police of New Orleans have all pubicly blasted the President of the United States for doing "Nothing" for two days . . . He's been called a Racist, a slacker and a "Bad president" . . .

Aw, c'mon . . now again, I have my complaints about some of the things the Current administration has said and done, as I did with the preceding administrations . . BUT: When you choose to blame people for not doing their jobs, lets put it where it belongs . . the people who have been elected by the local people because they are the first people to make decisions and who will tell the people up the chain what they need in the way of resources . .

I say that comfortably, because . . Do you see the same problems in any other place except New Orleans? No, the local people took command of the situation, the police and fire departments have responded quickly and kept the outlying towns from even resembling the situation in N.O. . . The Mayor, the Police Chief, and all the rest of the "First Responders" had no leadership, neither before, during, of after the storm . . . and the local "First Responders" still aren't doing their jobs a full week later . . it took the active military first, because the Louisana Governor sat on her wide A** and did nothing for 2 days, she never even alerted the N.G. until after the storm! She only sent in the N.G. after the rescue helicopters were being shot at!

At Noon today, Mountain Time, FEMA announced that ALL ports that had been closed, were open to shipping, with the exception of New Orleans . . Tell ya something?

Bush could've, probably should've just gone to Washington and waited for the calls . . he's supposed to have people who take care of things like this . . and if he doesn't, then he'd better Damn well fire the people who're supposed to do that and hire some who will . . if it's up to him to micro manage something the Federal Government isn't even by Constitution, obliged to do actually, it's a "State" thing y'know . . . then he really has a problem!

Chertoff is his guy to do the FEMA thing . . FEMA can't do much until they know what is required and being a bureaucracy, it doesn't move too fast . . th' military gets it done quick . . But it's still the people on th' ground at the point of need who knows what needs are to be met and the priority in which they're met! . . .

So let's not blame the Feds . . they can only react intelligently when there's intelligent requests made!

Digger Dan
09-05-2005, 07:15 AM
Nature's continues, as it always has, to inform. It is a far better predictor of the future than anything we humans do. To make the world a better place for human habitation--or just human survival, we have to listen to its messages. There is only one group that is responsible for the disaster in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast--humans--we need to all share the blame and the cost--put our backs to the task of immediate relief for those who are hurting the most and analize every tick of Nature's warning clock--tens of thousands ticks that generations have ignored--the task is mindboggling, but our choices are coming very close to the point of no return for civilization.

Zen Curmudgeon
09-05-2005, 07:47 PM
After 9/11 the Administration created the Department of Homeland Security, a super-sized Cabinet agency that enfolded FEMA. DHS produced a National Reponse Plan in December 2004 that specifies how all levels of government are expected to function in the event of a catastrophe, such as Katrina. You can read the entire 90-odd pages at the link below. I have pasted a couple of selections.

http://www.dhs.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/NRPbaseplan.pdf

From President Bush's introduction to the NRP:

". . .The end result [of the National Response Plan] is vastly improved coordination among Federal, State, local, and tribal organizations to help save lives and protect America's communities by increasing the speed, effectiveness, and efficiency of incident management."

The Plan allows the DHS to act without invitation from the onsite governments, but at the least,

..."Notification and full coordination with States will occur, but the coordination process must not delay or impede the rapid deployment and use of critical resources. States are urged to notify and coordinate with local governments regarding a proactive Federal response."

One of the selling points for the creation of the Dept of Homeland Security was the claim of improved efficiency, among other things. It appears that benefit has not been realized.

It also appears that President Bush badly overestimated the ability of DHS to respond to imminent threats to American lives, and DHS failed to follow its own written plan.

Take Care -

ZC

Digger Dan
09-06-2005, 07:12 AM
China's Renmin Wang
If the US could shift part of its astronomical military spending to counter-terrorism, guarding against natural disasters, epidemic disease control and other aspects, then the 9/11 attack, Hurricane Katrina, the spread of Aids and other tragedies could be avoided or mitigated.

Malaysia's Berita Harian
When the tsunami hit Asia last December, Bush succeeded in showing off his abilities by offering appropriate and well-organised humanitarian aid, but it seems he has been unresponsive, disorganised and discriminatory in dealing with the Katrina disaster.

Indonesia's Suara Merdeka
People may hate the selfish US stance. They may also condemn its military invasion of Iraq or criticise Washington's threats to Iran, Syria and North Korea. But, it is inhuman to be grateful for the American people's disaster. Indonesia, in particular, must not forget the services of the US military when the tsunami devastated Aceh.

Singapore's The Straits Times
The dead are only beginning to be gathered up. In Aceh and Thailand's beach resorts, those killed by the tsunami last December received the due respect of swift recovery, followed by identification. New Orleans people will not let Mr Bush forget this.

Australia's The Age
President Bush is increasingly seen as out of touch with ordinary people and with reality on the ground - in New Orleans and Iraq - and also on issues such as climate change. The president and, by association, Republicans are highly vulnerable for the first time in years. How the Administration responds has broader implications, too - a deeply unpopular, lame duck president could alter the balance of global leadership.

Afghanistan's Eslah
President Karzai has pledged 100,000 dollars for the victims of Hurricane Katrina. America has helped Afghanistan in various ways. Even if the assistance promised to the victims of Hurricane Katrina seems a symbolic act, it nevertheless shows that our country has credibility and authority in the international community.

Nahum Barnea in Israel's Yediot Aharonot
Just as 11 September 2001 changed the American agenda from internal matters to foreign policy and the war on terror, so Katrina is liable to take America back to its internal agenda: dealing with the environment, society, and the gaps between whites and blacks and between rich and poor.

Adli Sadiq in the Palestinian Al-Hayat al-Jadidah
After Hurricane Katrina, a new section of the American public is waking up to the wretchedness of the administration's policies and to the disasters that have hit Americans as a result. Today's Iraq is worse than yesterday's, and there are not enough helicopters to tackle the hurricane. Bush and his administration will be judged by history.

Iran's Resalat
Katrina was a natural catastrophe, but many experts believe America's policies have deepened the roots of the disaster. America had allocated the budgets for these areas to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Nick Reimer in Germany's die tageszeitung
New Orleans has already become a symbol: never before in human history has a natural disaster been predicted in such exact detail. Despite this, the prediction had no effect. It's as if mankind has lost the power to correct its own mistakes: In New Orleans, it slid into catastrophe submissively and with eyes wide open. Climate change has already arrived.

Russia's Komsomolskaya Pravda
[Russian] Emergencies Ministry planes have been under starter's orders for several days. But the go-ahead from the other side of the ocean never came. It leads you to think: Is Washington afraid of having US citizens rescued by people who are not flying the stars and stripes? Are they trying to preserve the prestige of a state that does not take easily to accepting aid from a "third-world" country? But isn't the saving of human life more important than PR or ideological considerations?

South Africa's Star
The death and destruction wrought by Hurricane Katrina also revealed the racial fissures in American society. Most of the hapless survivors who filled New Orleans' Superdome were black. Bush's other weaknesses are his poor environment record and his management of the US economy.

Zimbabwe's Herald
The fact that New Orleans is a southern town predominantly populated by African-Americans explains why President George W. Bush did not see the need to cut short his holiday. All that Bush has done so far is to issue threats against the victims, and deploying trigger-happy American troops - fresh from abusing Iraqi prisoners - to go and "restore order".

Zen Curmudgeon
09-07-2005, 07:26 PM
http://www.sltrib.com/utah/ci_3004197

Frustrated: Fire crews to hand out fliers for FEMA
By Lisa Rosetta, The Salt Lake Tribune

ATLANTA - Not long after some 1,000 firefighters sat down for eight hours of training, the whispering began: "What are we doing here?"

...Many of the firefighters, assembled from Utah and throughout the United States by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, thought they were going to be deployed as emergency workers.
Instead, they have learned they are going to be community-relations officers for FEMA, shuffled throughout the Gulf Coast region to disseminate fliers and a phone number: 1-800-621-FEMA.

...Federal officials are unapologetic.
"I would go back and ask the firefighter to revisit his commitment to FEMA, to firefighting and to the citizens of this country," said FEMA spokeswoman Mary Hudak.

..."There are all of these guys with all of this training and we're sending them out to hand out a phone number," an Oregon firefighter said. "They [the hurricane victims] are screaming for help and this day [of FEMA training] was a waste."
Firefighters say they want to brave the heat, the debris-littered roads, the poisonous cottonmouth snakes and fire ants and travel into pockets of Louisiana where many people have yet to receive emergency aid.
But as specific orders began arriving to the firefighters in Atlanta, a team of 50 Monday morning quickly was ushered onto a flight headed for Louisiana. The crew's first assignment: to stand beside President Bush as he tours devastated areas.

"You're doing a heck of a job, Brownie" in repairing the President's PR levee. After all, no one anticipated this levee would break.

Take Care -

ZC

large
09-07-2005, 08:56 PM
Once again, I'll say, the feds could've done better . . But they must have help from the cities and states affected . .

The President nor his agents can act in any capacity until the STATE has asked for Help, unless he "declares Martial Law during an Insurrection". That is a passage read by a Constitutional lawyer this afternoon . . no insurrections there!

And the Governor of Louisana has failed to agree with any of the things the federal government has asked to be allowed to do . . and yet She and the Mayor of New Orleans bleat and cry like they were the only area affected!

As far as Corps of Engineers budget cuts . . . The cuts were made at the behest and recommendation of several congressmen and knowledgeable engineers, BECAUSE . . the money previously had been either spent on other things unaccountable or the contracts were not being let by the Corps for a myriad of reasons . . one of them local corruption. Funding on several Corps projects have been halted and are currently being investigated both by congress and several Law enforcement agencies. Also a large share of the funding that has been cut affects not the Mississippi projects nor the Ponchartrain, but the Atchafalaya River Project . . which has had more money thrown at it than both of the others!

Do your homework on an objective level or it will appear to be slanted . . as it does

Digger Dan
09-08-2005, 06:56 AM
The President of the United States can, and historically has, acted immediately in the case of a "national emergenty" and the means at his or her disposal can involve the entire national bureaucracy. Historical precident and Constitutional means provide the justification. The president can invoke a number sanctioned activities to intervene when a 'national emergency" exists. Most presidents have infact done this, as has our current president. No doubt the bureaucracy at all levels, local, state and national must be held accountable for both failure and success during this present crisis. I, for one, am ashamed of the lack of immediate response by the federal bureaucracy and its ongoing SNAFU. We are up to our ears in bureaucrats who lack experience in the field. Don't fire them, send them to the front line and let them tramp the trenches. One soldier or one volunteer can do more than a battalion of bureaucrats.

Zen Curmudgeon
09-17-2005, 07:38 PM
http://fbc.binghamton.edu/commentr.htm

"When El Salvador has to offer troops to help restore order in New Orleans because U.S. troops were so scarce and so slow in arriving, Iran cannot be quaking in its boots about a possible U.S. invasion. When Sweden has its relief planes sitting on the tarmac in Sweden for a week because it cannot get an answer from the U.S. government as to whether to send them, they are not going to be reassured about the ability of the U.S. to handle more serious geopolitical matters. And when conservative U.S. television commentators talk of the U.S. looking like a Third World country, Third World countries may begin to think that maybe there is a grain of truth in the description."

Immanuel Wallerstein, Binghamton University, State University of New York

large
09-19-2005, 07:56 AM
Honestly, I think you must blame the Electronic media for this one . . New Orleans was not a phenomenom, it was a problem created by the Louisana Politicians, and in the long run, I'm betting some people are going to go to jail for this one . . again, Mississippi was damaged far worse than New Orleans and the surrounding area. . . . and considering those people choose to live below sea level between two bodies of water, and haven't used the funds they have been getting from the Feds for years on protection . . . the only reason the New Orleans "Crisis" existed was that it was far easier to cover a 10 square mile area with 200 reporters in helicopters and standing around than to cover all of Southern Mississippi . . the world's attention was focused on that 10 square mile area . . no place else!

It was a mess, no doubt about it, but the Louisana officials created it, and they will, in the end, pay for that!

The Feds aren't the "First Response" agency, never were, and never should be . . . and I can say this in their defense . . Until the local people on the ground can tell the Feds what's needed, where . . the Feds can't direct logistical supply . . whether it comes from Milwaukee or Sweden!

Again, it's easy to be critical, but one has to have facts to make suggestions . . .

Zen Curmudgeon
09-24-2005, 09:44 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/24/national/nationalspecial/24bush.html?adxnnl=1&pagewanted=all&adxnnlx=1127577767-asPNhSq7zuH4R+jfttWkQQ

Bush's Crisis Itinerary at Mercy of Weather, Even Nice Weather


By DAVID E. SANGER
Published: September 24, 2005

SAN ANTONIO, Sept. 23 - President Bush was supposed to land here on Friday afternoon on the first stop of a tour intended to make clear that he was personally overseeing the federal government's preparations for Hurricane Rita's landfall. But the weather did not cooperate.

It was too sunny.

...At the Federal Emergency Management Agency's command center in Washington a reporter asked him: "Sir, what good can you do going down to the hurricane zone? Might you get in the way?"

Mr. Bush quickly shot back, "One thing I won't do is get in the way." After explaining the purpose of his trip was to make sure federal, state and local officials coordinate well, he added, "We will make sure that my entourage does not get in the way of people doing their job, which will be search and rescue immediately."

...Another White House official involved in preparing Mr. Bush's way noted that with the sun shining so brightly in San Antonio, the images of Mr. Bush from here might not have made it clear to viewers that he was dealing with an approaching storm.

Take Care -

ZC

large
09-24-2005, 11:53 AM
Again . . NO PLAN! Get in front of a bank of Mikes and cameras, shout; "Get out now!" and then watch the traffic jam happen . . . the leaders in Texas aren't much smarter than the Louisana People . . probably 25% of the people who tried to get out of Houston and Galveston spent the night and the time during the Hurricane in their cars on the Highway than in the relative safety of their homes . . .

The saviour of this one was . . it wasn't very strong, moved relatively fast and came ashore in a fairly sparsley populated area . . minimal flooding for a hurricane with as large a "Footprint" as this one . . .

Any Politician who has the Balls to get up and pat any of themselves on the back is B.S.ing the multitudes . . .

This point of view is shared by myself, but authored by the e-mail comments of eight different people who live in Houston, Pasadena and Deer Park, five who left, or tried to leave and three who stayed . . .

And the difference between Houston and N'awleens is broad, Apples and Oranges, really . . Houston, for the most part, is 25 feet plus above Sea Level, sheltered by forests on the East and North . . It isn't a waterlogged ditch filled with old, sinking buildings . . . so any comparisons made between the two don't even come close to reality . . . .

Zen Curmudgeon
09-26-2005, 05:53 PM
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/09/22/national/main878583.shtml

Sept. 26, 2005
6:44 p.m.
(CBS) — CBS News correspondent Gloria Borger reports that Michael Brown, who recently resigned as the head of the FEMA, has been rehired by the agency as a consultant to evaluate it's response following Hurricane Katrina.

"Consultant" or "Exhibit A"?

Take Care -

ZC

Zen Curmudgeon
09-26-2005, 07:50 PM
http://boingboing.net/

* The Houston Chronicle's Rita blog includes a post that points out one benefit of hybrid cars.

As vehicles ran out of gas during the Houston exodus (aka biggest traffic jam ever), one Chronicle employee who drove a Prius completed the 30 hour, 170 mile trek on three-quarters a tank of gas.

Other happy hybrid owners who didn't have to stop for gas or turn off their A/C weigh in: "My folks drove to Austin from League City in their lexus hybrid and 21 hours of driving later still had 1/8 tank of gas left - plus they had my 87yr old grandfather with them and ran the air conditioner all day unlike most people who ran out of gas. 3 cheers for the hybrid!"

Take Care -

ZC

large
09-27-2005, 08:44 AM
Wunnerful little cars . . cost 60 to 70% more than a comparable conventional car . . so the savings is only in the cost of fuel . . the extra cost of purchase just about makes up for any monetary savings concerning fuel use . . NBC's 3 year survey (or experiment) showed a overall savings of $81 amortized over a Five year (60 month) period . .

Of course the idea of using less "Fossil Fuel" is still shouldered by the middle and upper middle class . . there are no Hybrid Gulfstreams, LearJets, 747's, nor can anyone in either the poor element of the free world nor the poor of the third world afford to buy (or maintain) a hybrid . . so what is the actual benefit? to You, the country, or the Planet?

Just as Bush refused to sign the Koyoto Treaty because . . We, the United States, and Western Europe would be the only signatories that would actually be held to the Standards . . . at great expense to our Corporations and Economies, while the emerging nations such as India and China could and would ignore the same regulations and sanctions . . and the Third world countries in the equatorial regions could continue their slash and burn of the Equatorial Rain Forests around the world, greatly affecting both the C/O2 balance and the ensuing "Greenhouse Effect' that is discussed so frequently . . With little understanding of what it actually is, and what causes it!!

Again, we blame people for things that we often don't even understand or can only understand in a limited way . . .

Zen Curmudgeon
10-09-2005, 01:04 PM
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-health9oct09,0,514336.story?coll=la-home-headlines

Shut Out on Healthcare After Storm
# Many hurricane victims don't qualify for aid if their insurance coverage vanished with their jobs.

By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Like most of those whose lives were upended by Hurricane Katrina, 52-year-old school bus driver Emanuel Wilson can thank the federal government for the fact that he has money to pay rent. He's also been given food stamps to make sure he can buy groceries. And if he had young children, the government would almost certainly be helping them get back to school.

But what Wilson needs is chemotherapy, and that is something the government seems unable to help him with. Wilson was being treated with monthly chemo injections for his intestinal cancer before the hurricane.

...He's not alone. Of 6,322 displaced households that had applied for Medicaid through Sept. 23 in Louisiana, more than half, 3,456, were not eligible under current rules, according to the state.

...In the Senate, a $9-billion bill with bipartisan support would help cover costs of healthcare in Louisiana, Mississippi and parts of Alabama. Childless adults with low incomes — like Wilson — could get Medicaid. Subsidies would help others maintain private coverage. Hospitals and other facilities could tap into an $800-million fund for hurricane costs.

...But opposition by the administration has stalled the legislation. Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt said it would establish "a massive new federal program" and "a new Medicaid entitlement."

Take Care -

ZC