PDA

View Full Version : Pueblos Sewage problem


davide
12-09-2009, 11:05 AM
It looks like Pueblo could really use some TARP money. Who is responsible for securing it ? Did someone put Solar over Sewage ?
That is an odd priority.

http://www.chieftain.com/articles/2009/12/05/news/local/doc4b1a0a5daec12295695987.txt


Published: December 05, 2009 12:37 am
Partially treated sewer water released into river
Pueblo has been trying to fund improvements at the wastewater plant to eliminate river spills.


By CHRIS WOODKA
THE PUEBLO CHIEFTAIN


A release of more than 300,000 gallons of partially treated wastewater raises new questions about aging systems at the Pueblo sewage treatment plant.

The release occurred at about 5 p.m. Thursday, at the James DiIorio Wastewater Reclamation facility about a mile east of the confluence of Fountain Creek and the Arkansas River, releasing an estimated 323,750 gallons of wastewater that had not been treated with chlorine, according to Gene Michael, wastewater superintendent.

“This isn’t raw sewage. This is water that has been completely treated, except for the disinfectant,” Michael said.

The release was caused when an automatic valve that switches chlorine feed from one bank to another malfunctioned. An alarm sounded, as it is supposed to, but it took as long as 40 minutes to gain manual control of the system. The Colorado and Pueblo City-County health departments were notified.

“This raises suspicions about the age of the facility,” said Ross Vincent, chairman of the Sangre de Cristo Sierra Club. “The system is very old and clearly needs upgrades that will require investments the city has been unwilling to make. We hope the state health department would require the city to make the type of investment of money it needs.

This is the second largest spill since 2007 at the Pueblo treatment plant. In 2007, a vacuum line broke, causing 500,000 gallons of over chlorinated water to be released into the Arkansas River.

The city realizes the plant is aging, and has tried to make upgrades, but they are expensive, Michael said.

“It’s certainly an old plant and we’d like to make upgrades, but it costs money to do that,” Michael said.

The city applied for federal stimulus money to upgrade to an ultraviolet treatment system that would eliminate the need for the chlorination treatment, the last step before water is released to the Arkansas River.

The city received a portion of the money for a solar power system, about $1.5 million. Installing the solar panels will cost a total of about $2.2 million.

The UV treatment system, which did not receive federal stimulus funds, would cost about $4 million, Michael said.

Bacteriological samples have been taken from the river and effluent and are being analyzed. It’s expected that results will not be available until the first part of next week, Michael added.

cwoodka@chieftain.com

large
12-09-2009, 11:51 AM
No, they (City Council) put a new Police Station over sewage.

Go back to the discussion about the SDS project . . it's all explained there . .

However, in the case of both spills (if one chooses to really call them that) the first was "over chlorinated" and the second was clean, without the clorine added . . According to a friend who works at the water works, cleaner, actually, than to what comes into the water works at the West end . . Which would give you pause if you ever cleaned out the "Primary Settling Ponds" . .

No reflection on anyone who works on either end . . They do good work and turn out a good product, again, at both ends . .

davide
12-09-2009, 12:52 PM
So ... you want to live down stream from it huh ? Its not old and in need of repair ?

large
12-09-2009, 01:20 PM
What, exactly do you know about water purification and the EPA requirements?

My guess, NOTHING!

On the other hand, I was involved as a sub contractor, working for and with the Pueblo Water Board, and do know a little about both the requirements and the processes . .

So let's examine and answer your ignorant postulation . . .
So ... you want to live down stream from it huh ? Its not old and in need of repair ?

The first . . It certainly wouldn't bother me, first, because we live downstream from Leadville (Heavy Metal Concentrations) and all the other little towns between there and here. Most are in the same boat as Pueblo and other medium sized population centers living in the Arkansas drainage . . Below here, some of the towns like La Junta and Lamar have a higher requirement to hurdle because they don't enjoy the flow that we have . . thus 600 PPM back into the river is a lot harder to meet.

Regarding our drinking water,as I said, It's good, clean and safe . . not perhaps for your tropical fish during the months of December, Janurary, and February because of the Ammonia content. But once the new manifold is installed at the face of the dam, that issue will be solved . . We benefit greatly from the Dam because since the permanent Pool was established we have a primary stilling and settling pool outside the oversight of the Water Board that enables cleaner water to be taken into the process, and therefore both speeds up and economizes the purification process.

That being said, ALL water and Sewage treatment plants are in need for update, simply because the EPA changes the requirements every year and in order to meet those requirements money must be spent. So as far as age . . you seem to be the bullsh*t expert here, so you tell me . . is it old and in need of repair? When was it built and how much did it cost? Was it designed to meet EPA Standards 10 years in the future?

Give us some FACTS . .

Colleen
12-12-2009, 03:26 PM
Cities with the worst water:

1. Pensacola, FL
2. Riverside, CA
3. Las Vegas, NV
4. Riverside County, CA
5. Reno, NV
6. Houston, TX
7. Omaha, NE
8. North Las Vegas, NV
9. San Diego, CA
10. Jacksonville, FL

Pueblo didn't make the list, what's up with that??

http://green.yahoo.com/blog/the_conscious_consumer/110/cities-with-best-and-worst-tap-water.html